1396 1474 Stock Photos and Images
Mt. Taibo in the Style of Wang Meng, 1442. Du Qiong (Chinese, 1396-1474). Handscroll, ink and light color on paper; overall: 29.8 x 591.8 cm (11 3/4 x 233 in Stock Photohttps://www.alamy.com/image-license-details/?v=1https://www.alamy.com/mt-taibo-in-the-style-of-wang-meng-1442-du-qiong-chinese-1396-1474-handscroll-ink-and-light-color-on-paper-overall-298-x-5918-cm-11-34-x-233-in-image240446104.htmlRMRY57CT–Mt. Taibo in the Style of Wang Meng, 1442. Du Qiong (Chinese, 1396-1474). Handscroll, ink and light color on paper; overall: 29.8 x 591.8 cm (11 3/4 x 233 in
![Mt. Taibo in the Style of Wang Meng, 1442. When a Chinese painter "imitated" a painting by a past master, the intention was never to produce an exact copy. Du Qiong, the Ming painter from Suzhou, is a case in point. The painting style of this handscroll is actually closer to that of Huang Gongwang (1269-1354; see photo 1) than to the style of Wang Meng (about 1301-1385; see photo 2). Both masters were active during the previous dynasty and are among the so-called Four Great Masters of the Yuan dynasty (1279-1368). In this painting, the interplay of styles, including Du Qiong's own, c Stock Photo](https://c8.alamy.com/comp/2A51KNH/mt-taibo-in-the-style-of-wang-meng-1442-when-a-chinese-painter-quotimitatedquot-a-painting-by-a-past-master-the-intention-was-never-to-produce-an-exact-copy-du-qiong-the-ming-painter-from-suzhou-is-a-case-in-point-the-painting-style-of-this-handscroll-is-actually-closer-to-that-of-huang-gongwang-1269-1354-see-photo-1-than-to-the-style-of-wang-meng-about-1301-1385-see-photo-2-both-masters-were-active-during-the-previous-dynasty-and-are-among-the-so-called-four-great-masters-of-the-yuan-dynasty-1279-1368-in-this-painting-the-interplay-of-styles-including-du-qiongs-own-c-2A51KNH.jpg "Mt. Taibo in the Style of Wang Meng, 1442. When a Chinese painter "imitated" a painting by a past master, the intention was never to produce an exact copy. Du Qiong, the Ming painter from Suzhou, is a case in point. The painting style of this handscroll is actually closer to that of Huang Gongwang (1269-1354; see photo 1) than to the style of Wang Meng (about 1301-1385; see photo 2). Both masters were active during the previous dynasty and are among the so-called Four Great Masters of the Yuan dynasty (1279-1368). In this painting, the interplay of styles, including Du Qiong's own, c Stock Photo")
Mt. Taibo in the Style of Wang Meng, 1442. When a Chinese painter "imitated" a painting by a past master, the intention was never to produce an exact copy. Du Qiong, the Ming painter from Suzhou, is a case in point. The painting style of this handscroll is actually closer to that of Huang Gongwang (1269-1354; see photo 1) than to the style of Wang Meng (about 1301-1385; see photo 2). Both masters were active during the previous dynasty and are among the so-called Four Great Masters of the Yuan dynasty (1279-1368). In this painting, the interplay of styles, including Du Qiong's own, c Stock Photohttps://www.alamy.com/image-license-details/?v=1https://www.alamy.com/mt-taibo-in-the-style-of-wang-meng-1442-when-a-chinese-painter-quotimitatedquot-a-painting-by-a-past-master-the-intention-was-never-to-produce-an-exact-copy-du-qiong-the-ming-painter-from-suzhou-is-a-case-in-point-the-painting-style-of-this-handscroll-is-actually-closer-to-that-of-huang-gongwang-1269-1354-see-photo-1-than-to-the-style-of-wang-meng-about-1301-1385-see-photo-2-both-masters-were-active-during-the-previous-dynasty-and-are-among-the-so-called-four-great-masters-of-the-yuan-dynasty-1279-1368-in-this-painting-the-interplay-of-styles-including-du-qiongs-own-c-image330107725.htmlRM2A51KNH–Mt. Taibo in the Style of Wang Meng, 1442. When a Chinese painter "imitated" a painting by a past master, the intention was never to produce an exact copy. Du Qiong, the Ming painter from Suzhou, is a case in point. The painting style of this handscroll is actually closer to that of Huang Gongwang (1269-1354; see photo 1) than to the style of Wang Meng (about 1301-1385; see photo 2). Both masters were active during the previous dynasty and are among the so-called Four Great Masters of the Yuan dynasty (1279-1368). In this painting, the interplay of styles, including Du Qiong's own, c
. Bonner zoologische Monographien. Zoology. 70 Table 13: AUometric proportions: length of palate to SIZE MW SIZE MW GL tan a r Lot Carollia 3.0448 1.0152 0.5367 0.8612 0.0004 Phyllostomus 3.4483 1.1725 0.3515 0.9417 0.0061 Brachyphylla 3.3195 1.0971 0.0294 Erophylla 3.1089 1.0385 0.0030 Phyllonycteris 3.1474 1.0351 0.4277 0.8212 0.0179 Lionycteris 2.8508 0.9834 -0.0462 Lonchophylla 3.0317 1.1499 0.5489 0.9453 -0.1396 Platalina 3.2137 1.2813 -0.1975 Glossophaga 2.9211 1.0724 0.7368 0.6807 -0.1068 Monophyllus 2.9833 1.0726 0.4512 0.1410 -0.0819 Lichonycteris 2.8414 1.0033 -0.0699 Leptonycteris 3 Stock Photohttps://www.alamy.com/image-license-details/?v=1https://www.alamy.com/bonner-zoologische-monographien-zoology-70-table-13-auometric-proportions-length-of-palate-to-size-mw-size-mw-gl-tan-a-r-lot-carollia-30448-10152-05367-08612-00004-phyllostomus-34483-11725-03515-09417-00061-brachyphylla-33195-10971-00294-erophylla-31089-10385-00030-phyllonycteris-31474-10351-04277-08212-00179-lionycteris-28508-09834-00462-lonchophylla-30317-11499-05489-09453-01396-platalina-32137-12813-01975-glossophaga-29211-10724-07368-06807-01068-monophyllus-29833-10726-04512-01410-00819-lichonycteris-28414-10033-00699-leptonycteris-3-image234487503.htmlRMRHDR5K–. Bonner zoologische Monographien. Zoology. 70 Table 13: AUometric proportions: length of palate to SIZE MW SIZE MW GL tan a r Lot Carollia 3.0448 1.0152 0.5367 0.8612 0.0004 Phyllostomus 3.4483 1.1725 0.3515 0.9417 0.0061 Brachyphylla 3.3195 1.0971 0.0294 Erophylla 3.1089 1.0385 0.0030 Phyllonycteris 3.1474 1.0351 0.4277 0.8212 0.0179 Lionycteris 2.8508 0.9834 -0.0462 Lonchophylla 3.0317 1.1499 0.5489 0.9453 -0.1396 Platalina 3.2137 1.2813 -0.1975 Glossophaga 2.9211 1.0724 0.7368 0.6807 -0.1068 Monophyllus 2.9833 1.0726 0.4512 0.1410 -0.0819 Lichonycteris 2.8414 1.0033 -0.0699 Leptonycteris 3
